Testseek.com have collected 79 expert reviews of the Intel Core i3 6100 3.7GHz Socket 1151 and the average rating is 83%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Intel Core i3 6100 3.7GHz Socket 1151.
December 2016
(83%)
79 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Users
(93%)
1562 Reviews
Average score from owners of the product.
83010079
Reviews
page 2 of 8
Order by:
Score
Published: 2016-08-08, Author: Ian , review by: anandtech.com
This review tested the Core i3-6320, the i3-6300 and the i3-6100. All three differ in their base frequency in a regular fashion, going from 3.9 GHz to 3.8 GHz and 3.7 GHz respectively. The Core i3-6100 also has another two adjustments: the integrated grap...
Was this review helpful?
-
Published: 2016-06-16, Author: HP , review by: relaxedtech.com
Compatible With AM3+ Socket, Cheap Platform Price, Good Multi-Core Performance, Silent Stock Cooler
Weak Single-Core Performance, High Power Consumption
Both chips retail for around the same and both are aimed at budget users. With that being said, the FX-6350 is hard to beat and having an unlocked multiplier makes the FX-6350 a much better product than the i3-6100 CPU. Not only did the Wraith cool much b...
Published: 2016-05-27, Author: Steven , review by: techspot.com
Abstract: Though there are still some hotly anticipated titles due in 2016, we might already have the game of the year on our hands. Overwatch has been on our radar for a while now but it recently blew up in a big way with an open beta that attracted over 9 million...
Abstract: Mainstream CPUs are the bestseller models, since they gather more processing power than the value ones and are not as expensive as the high-end models. Today, we will compare two new intermediate processors, the A10-7870K from AMD and the Core i3-6100 “Sk...
High clock speed compared to costlier Intel chips, Support for four threads via Hyper-Threading, Lowest-cost "Skylake" Core processor, Impressive performance, particularly on tasks that aren't fully threaded
Significantly more expensive than competing AMD four-core CPU, Not unlocked for overclocking, Integrated HD 530 graphics can't match similarly priced AMD alternatives
If you're building a budget-priced Intel PC for gaming or general-purpose use, this chip is a great starting point, and surprisingly speedy. But cash-strapped gamers may want to consider more-affordable AMD alternatives. Read More...
Was this review helpful?
Award
(80%)
Published: 2016-02-08, Author: Keith , review by: wccftech.com
Abstract: A couple of months ago we reported on ASRock releasing their SkyOC bios that allowed for overclocking non K sku Skylake cpu's by BCLK overclocking. This set the overclocking community into a bit of a frenzy as it's the been the first time since K chips we...
Published: 2015-11-18, Author: Steven , review by: techspot.com
Abstract: Early this year we compared AMD's $150 quad-core FX-8320E processor with Intel's $150 Core i3-4360 and $185 Core i5-4430. On paper it looked like a no brainer: the FX-8320E boasts 8 threads capable of running at up to 4GHz out of the box and is fully unlo...
Abstract: When Intel first launched their Skylake processors, buyers’ choices were essentially limited to a pair of options: the i7 6700K and later the i5 6600K. Both boasted features enthusiasts looked for like unlocked multipliers and fast out-of-box performance...
Fast single-core performance, Low power requirements, Skylake for under £100
Can't compete in multi-core benchmarks, A little slower in some games
Performance Analysis The best part of the i3-6100's specification is its single-core speed, so it's no surprise that this affordable chip excelled in benchmarks where pure pace is advantageous. It immediately punched above its weight in the Cinebench R15...