Testseek.com have collected 116 expert reviews of the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3 and the average rating is 79%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3.
July 2011
(79%)
116 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Abstract: The GF3 twin lens kit with the 14mm f/2.5 'pancake' lens and 14-42mm zoom lens in red. (Source: Panasonic.)The camera was supplied with the Lumix G 14mm f/2.5 ASPH. 'pancake' lens, which is one of the choices for single-lens kit buyers. Marginally slower ...
Compact and light with 14mm lens attached. Good image quality, very similar to the GF2. Snappy performance
No accessory port/viewfinder option. Touchscreen can take a couple of attempts to press. Screen is still relatively low resolution
The GF3 is a fun little addition to the Panasonic G series range. As a first step into the world of interchangeable lens cameras, it does a decent job of bridging the gap between compact and SLR. ...
Abstract: Looking at the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3 (SRT $799), the new 12.1 megapixel ILC, one could easily confuse it for a regular point and shoot camera. It is, after all, the smallest and lightest ILC camera in the market today.We shot some photos of the GF3 next...
The new Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3W is a pretty decent camera, with good specifications and features. At the end of this test we consider that this camera a good choice if you want to buy a Micro Four Thirds model....
Solid metal build; easy to use; responsive touch screen and AF; Creative Control modes including the punchy Expressive
Pricey compared to a fixed-lens compact like Panasonic’s LX5 (£458.99); mono sound; no hotshoe and accessory port
Otherwise, a full-size JPEG is saved in two to three seconds; shoot a maximum-quality Raw file alongside and wait a further second before the screen snaps back to live view. We particularly enjoyed the Expressive shooting mode, which boosts JPEG colour sa...
Was this review helpful?
(80%)
Published: 2011-11-18, Author: Ben , review by: alphr.com
Extremely rewarding to use, but noise levels in low light aren't up to today's standards...
Was this review helpful?
(83%)
Published: 2011-09-20, Author: Jeremy , review by: reviewed.com
Our disappointment with the camera stems from the fact that it showed little to no improvement over its predecessor, the GF2, in terms of video recording features and capability. The camera has no aperture or shutter speed control options in video mode, i...
