tw.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Western Digital 3.5 inch RE Enterprise SATA600 WD-FYYZ



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Western Digital 3.5 inch RE Enterprise SATA600 WD-FYYZ

Testseek.com have collected 27 expert reviews of the Western Digital 3.5 inch RE Enterprise SATA600 WD-FYYZ and the average rating is 83%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Western Digital 3.5 inch RE Enterprise SATA600 WD-FYYZ.
 
(83%)
27 Reviews
Users
(100%)
3 Reviews
83 0 100 27

 

Reviews

page 1 of 3
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2017-03-27, Author: 派大星 , review by: pcdiy.com.tw

  • Abstract:  又有硬碟鬧機瘟,這次出事的是威騰企業級硬碟(WD Enterprise-class),WD RE 3TB硬碟,型號:WD3000FYYZ 光華商場每天都有新鮮事,今天一樣不例外。PCDIY!光華商場特派記者派大星,今天在光華商場遊晃挖新聞的時候,突然遇到玩家,跟店家老闆買硬碟。玩家提到,今天「 NAS網路磁碟伺服器 使用者俱樂部」,網友爆料出大事了!說又有硬碟鬧「機瘟」,而且這次死傷慘重。 威騰WD RE 3TB硬碟驚爆鬧機瘟,48顆就壞25顆,死亡率高達52.08% 什麼!硬碟大廠Seagat...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2014-02-01, Author: weilee504 , review by: xfastest.com

  • 雖然說拿2.5吋5400轉硬碟來跟以標榜高效能為賣點的WD Re系列2TB企業硬碟相比,似乎有點勝之不武,而事實上也跟大人欺負小孩的意思差不了多少,但是仔細一想,以HGST這款500GB的2.5吋硬碟在效能方面約莫等同於三年前的3.5吋硬碟產品吧,那時候一顆500GB的3.5吋硬碟效能也差不多是在100MB/s左右,跟我測得的成績差不多。而若是經由升級WD Re系列2TB企業硬碟所得到的性能增益是如此明顯的話,也許同樣也因為硬碟效能低落而飽受拖累的人,趕緊升級新款、新製程、新技術的硬碟,應該是相當值得的吧...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2013-05-06, Author: wingphoenix , review by: xfastest.com

  • Abstract:  高品質的產品相信使用者都樂於接受(當然前提是不能太貴或是比起同級產品貴太多),一般PC主要零組件保固期間多為3年,周邊配件常見為1-2年,5年以上的保固期則較為少見,目前比較能看到就是ASUS SABERTOOTH系列主機板、高階SSD產品、高階POWER及高階的硬碟(如WD BLACK、RE系列等)等產品,能提供5年產品保固的廠商當然時對其產品耐用度及品質有信心,畢竟保固時間長,廠商所需擔負的備料成本及保固維修成本都會比3年保固產品高上不少,能提供5年保固產品可以視為高品質產品的門檻,...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2016-10-07, review by: mydrivers.com

  • 总的来说,西数RE 4TB黑盘的性能表现让人满意,170MB/s左右的持续读取速度比桌面级的4TB黑盘表现要好得多,对于有大容量存储需求的用户来说是一个不错的选择,虽然售价比桌面级的4TB黑盘略贵一些,但以价格换性能也值得了。随着文件体积越来越大,尤其是720p甚至是1080p电影的越来越多,普通的500G甚至1TB的硬盘空间已经显得捉襟见肘,对于大多数用户而言,如果只想用单块硬盘而且对容量、性能都有一定的需求,因此在不考虑成本的前提下,西数RE 4TB黑盘绝对是你的不二之选。目前该硬盘在国内还没有上市,...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2020-04-02, Author: Lawrence , review by: gadgetreview.com

  • Abstract:  The best product we tried was easily the WD Blue 4TB PC Hard Drive, which offers quick transfer speeds of 6Gb/s, a fuss-free two year warranty and an easy install that offers near plug-and-play simplicity to most personal computers. We also liked that thi...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2014-07-31, review by: vrworld.com

  • Abstract:  Solid performance, great reliability, scales wellToday I'm taking another look at Western Digital's WD RE 4 TB WD4000FYYZ enterprise drives. I reviewed a single WD4000FYYZ in our Western Digital 4 TB roundup , and Western Digital was kind enough to provid...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-11-13, review by: vrworld.com

  • Abstract:  Today we are taking a look at some of Western Digital’s high end 4 TB drives: the WD4000FYYZ RE enterprise drive, the WD4001FAEX Black Series consumer drive, and the WD4003FZEX Black Series consumer drive. Each one of these drives is designed to prov...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-02-13, Author: Josh , review by: maximumpc.com

  • Lots of storage; semiaffordable; fast.
  • Not 1TB per platter; 3x cost of 3TB drive.

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2013-01-21, review by: techgage.com

  • 4TB – need we say more?, Fantastic performance. Handily beats out the Black 4TB, Boasts numerous enterpriselevel features focusing on security and stability
  • Pricing – but it's to be expected on enterprise equipment

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2013-01-13, review by: techwarelabs.com

  • As the benchmarks show, the WD WD4000FYYZ RE is a solid performer. Partitioning it on our test system was no challenge, though its unusually large capacity might cause problems if you intend to use it with an older NAS. Four terabytes is a huge amount...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
    page 1 of 3 « Previous   1 2 3   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×